It is Park Geun Hye who should make a right option

By CPRK Secretariat

The Secretariat of the Committee for the Peaceful Reunification of Korea (CPRK) released a following questionnaire Wednesday one year since Park Geun Hye became "president" through fraud-marred election:

Park has run the whole gamut of rhetoric such as "road of peace and common development" and "new era on the Korean Peninsula," vociferating about "reform" and "confidence" whenever an opportunity presented itself during her election campaign and after her assumption of office, the questionnaire noted, and continued: All compatriots are, however, recollecting how deceptive and shameless jargons they were.

How does the present regime's north policy differ from the Lee Myung Bak regime's confrontation policy?

The Park regime's policy toward the north has nothing different from the Lee Myung Bak regime's confrontation policy. Park's policy surpasses that of the Lee regime in its crafty and vicious nature.

This proves that the Park regime is just the continuation of the Lee regime and it only seeks fiercer confrontation with the DPRK than Lee's.

Who is the arch criminal harassing peace and escalating tension on the peninsula?

After taking office the Park regime has become all the more dangerous in its moves to provoke a war against the DPRK in collusion with the U.S.

All this goes to prove that the U.S. and its stooge Park regime are the arch criminals who have disturbed peace and escalated tensions on the peninsula.

Confidence or confrontation?

Park Geun Hye pledged to "take one step after another to build confidence between the south and the north" while talking about "confidence-building".

But behind the scene, she challenged head-on the social system in the DPRK, while calling for "giving priority to the regime change in the north" and urging the north to "opt for making real change".

Park went the lengths of slandering the policy of the DPRK. She let loose such vituperation as terming it "way of inviting isolation" and "the north will never succeed".

To whom does Park give priority, outsiders or the nation?

After taking office, Park tightened nexus with the U.S. more zealously than any others, while calling for "tightened south Korea-U.S. alliance" and "all-inclusive alliance."

Park and her group even subordinated the north-south ties to the U.S. policy for invading the DPRK, while blustering that "south-north relations can be settled smoothly only when south Korea-U.S. alliance is tightened".

Park made no scruple of committing such act of treachery as begging for "international cooperation" to stifle the DPRK, while malignantly slandering the fellow countrymen during her trip to the U.S. and other countries in Europe.

Who is a provoker?

The Park group never opens its mouth without talking about "provocation" and "threat" to justify its confrontation and war moves.

But the reality proves that it is none other than the U.S. and the Park regime which are keen to provoke a war on the peninsula.

Who is responsible for mud-slinging and who is obliged to stop it?

The puppet group of conservatives is malignantly slandering the DPRK. They range from the "president", "prime minister", representative of "the Saenuri Party", authorities concerned, paid journalists and experts to anchor persons.

It is hurling even aged ultra-right conservatives and human scum into smear campaigns against the DPRK. It is the Park regime which should stop the smear campaign.

Who should make a right option?

South Korea is now swept by waves of fierce actions of people of all social standings against the puppet regime's sycophancy and treachery, confrontation with fellow countrymen and unpopular rule.

The reality shows that it is none other than Park Geun Hye herself who should make a right option.

(KCNA - December 25, 2013)

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post